oliversb Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Hey there, I am currently developing a game making system so it is important that I choose the right engine/framework. I can see PandaJS supports Windows Phone 8 from the website, this is something that sounds particularly awesome for my game making system.Phaser appears to considerably more popular though, why is this?What advantages and disadvantages does one have over the other, if any?I am looking to develop a system that is as cross platform as I can get it so PandaJS looks like my best bet. Though, I want to hear from people who have used these tools. Also, what is the purpose of the ImpactPandaJS thing? I do not understand what this was and what the point in it is. BUT I have got Windows Phone 8 and HTML5 sorted instead of just HTML5 then that seems pretty awesome to me at the moment. If it makes any difference, my game making system generates Javascript code which is then opened in a web browser. I originally started using EaselJS and I was successful with that. But EaselJS is not really a game engine or game framework and I felt that it would be more productive for me to switch over to other engine. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Given that there are plenty of tutorials available for both, and everyone has their own personal preference when it comes to these sorts of things, why not just spend 1hr with each of them and see which feels better for you? Has to ultimately be more valuable I'd imagine. enpu and xdiepx 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oliversb Posted April 23, 2014 Author Share Posted April 23, 2014 Thankyou very much for your unboised opinion. I did not know if they both would be as good and not really have advantages over each other. I have chosen PandaJS simply because I have already spent a little time using it. And by the sounds of it. It would be a waist of time to make a switch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 They each work in their own ways, the code structure and approach between the two is very different. But I don't think that makes either one better than the other. If you're already using Panda and it does what you need, then carry on using it imho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.